Welcome
Welcome to Military Power.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!

The Atlatl

Discussion on advances in Military equipment and weaponry over time.

The Atlatl

Postby Maximus the Destroyer on Mon Sep 22, 2008 1:19 pm

The thought occurs to me: Why the heck didn't the Romans make use of this thing during the Republic and the early Imperial eras? You would think that an atlatl-launched Marian javelin would have been a lot more effective than the bare-hand launched variety they did use, and yet I've never heard of the Romans or other classical civilization using an atlatl. In a casual internet search, I can't find a single instance of a classical civilization using an atlatl, either. Which leads me to think that I haven't somehow missed mention of it, in my readings.

Was the technique of the atlatl lost in between the high stone age, and the early days of civilization? Wasn't someone using the thing during the Roman era, somewhere? For that matter, why didn't any other early civilized nation use them?

It seems really bizarre, when you think about it: How did such a simple and effective technique get lost? Did it? Was there something about the atlatl technique that would have prevented a Roman legionary or other spear-chucking soldier from making effective use of it?

The more I think about this, the stranger it is.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -Thomas Jefferson

"A man-of-war is the best ambassador" -Oliver Cromwell
User avatar
Maximus the Destroyer
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 672
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:15 am

Re: The Atlatl

Postby Goliath on Mon Sep 22, 2008 9:35 pm

A couple of thoughts on this...

It needed too much space to use, remember we are talking about the age of massed infantry here. Not too much space between ranks and files.

A Roman legionary, even with his pila, was a shock rather than missile trooper. The pila were an extension of shock, to be used at close range rather than at 'missile' distances. Like a grenade rather than a mortar.

Archery was more effective, longer ranged and more accurate.
The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it. - George Orwell

America has never been an empire. We may be the only great power in history that had the chance, and refused – preferring greatness to power and justice to glory. - George W. Bush
User avatar
Goliath
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:12 pm
Call Sign: Tiny


Return to Equipment and Weaponry in History

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron