Welcome
Welcome to Military Power.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!

Barack Obama

Discussions of a political nature

Re: Barack Obama

Postby Goliath on Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:17 am

Well... I could have sworn I saw someone mention the questionnaire you had to answer to be on Obama's Cabinet, but I can't find it. Here is a recap though.
The questionnaire includes 63 requests for personal and professional records, some covering applicants’ spouses and grown children as well, that are forcing job-seekers to rummage from basements to attics, in shoe boxes, diaries and computer archives to document both their achievements and missteps.

Only the smallest details are excluded; traffic tickets carrying fines of less than $50 need not be reported, the application says. Applicants are asked whether they or anyone in their family owns a gun. They must include any e-mail that might embarrass the president-elect, along with any blog posts and links to their Facebook pages.

The application also asks applicants to “please list all aliases or ‘handles’ you have used to communicate on the Internet.”

Just in case the previous 62 questions do not ferret out any potential controversy, the 63rd is all-encompassing: “Please provide any other information, including information about other members of your family, that could suggest a conflict of interest or be a possible source of embarrassment to you, your family, or the president-elect.”

The answer could duplicate the response to Question 8: “Briefly describe the most controversial matters you have been involved with during the course of your career.”

Source

Now for what I really wanted to post about...

Tom Daschle seems to have failed the questionnaire in a most spectacular way, yet Obama won't waiver on his support for him. At least one question seems open-ended enough to have potentially jogged Daschle’s memory and elicited the information:
“Please provide the names and details of any individuals and organizations with which you or your spouse have been associated with which might present a conflict of interest with your proposed federal office, or have the potential for embarrassment,” reads question No. 20 under the section “Relationships and Affiliations.” And there are another eight questions on taxes, including whether the nominee “has any expectation that you will be the subject of any tax, financial or other audit or inquiry.” Apparently, tax evasion wasn't mentioned.

And I find it interesting that Tom Daschle, a man who literally made millions in 4 years from "clients" in the health industry, is made Secretary of Health and Human Services, without that seeming like a conflict of interest.
The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it. - George Orwell

America has never been an empire. We may be the only great power in history that had the chance, and refused – preferring greatness to power and justice to glory. - George W. Bush
User avatar
Goliath
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:12 pm
Call Sign: Tiny

Re: Barack Obama

Postby Maximus the Destroyer on Sat Feb 07, 2009 2:35 pm

On yet another morning of grim economic news, President Obama sought to further distance himself from his predecessor on Friday as he announced steps that he said would strengthen organized labor and improve the lot of middle-class Americans.

At a White House ceremony, the president signed three executive orders that he said would “reverse many of the policies towards organized labor that we’ve seen these last eight years, policies with which I’ve sharply disagreed.”

Soon afterward, Vice President Biden drew applause when he flung another dart at former President George W. Bush and former Vice President Dick Cheney (on Mr. Cheney’s 68th birthday) as he told labor officials in the audience, “Welcome back to the White House.”

“I do not view the labor movement as part of the problem,” Mr. Obama said. “To me, it’s part of the solution.”

Source

I guess we know where he stands on the future of the U.S. He is going to drag the country into even more into trouble. Unlike Obama, I think that Unions are one of the main reasons the U.S. has been shipping all our jobs overseas.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -Thomas Jefferson

"A man-of-war is the best ambassador" -Oliver Cromwell
User avatar
Maximus the Destroyer
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 672
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:15 am

Re: Barack Obama

Postby CrazyCatman on Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:18 pm

White House aides indicated that President Obama will sign a $410 billion spending bill, even though it contains thousands of special projects or earmarks. The AP reports the White House "on Sunday downplayed massive deficit spending and President Barack Obama's pledge not to sign legislation laden with billions in earmarks amid Republican criticism that he was recanting on a key campaign promise."

The New York Times reports Office of Management and Budget Director Peter Orszag and Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel "said Sunday that President Obama would sign a $410 billion spending bill that includes thousands of pet projects, known as earmarks, despite campaign promises to put an end to the practice." Republican leaders, "meanwhile, accused the president of breaking his promises to change Washington's ways."

Source

First it was the $787 billion spending package. Then it was his $3 trillion budget. And what does the president choose to lecture Americans on? Fiscal responsibility! And for that, he gets our Liberal Translation treatment:

OBAMA: Just as a family has to make hard choices about where to spend and where to save, so do we as a government.

LIBERAL TRANSLATION: And the hard choice has been made: We're going to spend. Hey, it's your money, not mine!

OBAMA: There are times when you can afford to redecorate your house, and there are times when you need to refocus on rebuilding its foundation. Today, we have to focus on foundation.

LIBERAL TRANSLATION: But that doesn't mean we aren't doing some redecorating too. Take the $44 million I am spending to renovate the Department of Agriculture, for example.

OBAMA: Having inherited a trillion dollar deficit that will take us a long time to us close...

LIBERAL TRANSLATION: Especially now that I have DOUBLED it.

OBAMA: ... we need to focus on what we need to do to move the economy forward, not on what is nice to have.

LIBERAL TRANSLATION: And by "we" I mean YOU. I'm not giving up my plane, chopper, limo and personal chef.

While I know many consider this source highly conservative, I decided, they do make a decent point.

More from Fox if you are interested...
Only hours after President Obama's national speech on being responsible with money, Congress is already pushing a $410 billion omnibus spending bill loaded with pork! The bill’s 8,570 "disclosed earmarks" will cost another $7.7 billion! Here are some of the absolutely necessary projects:
$900,000 to fight flies in Nebraska
$400,000 to combat bullying in Montana
$200,000 for tattoo removals in California
$4.5 million for the Center for Grape Genetics


I'm thinking KT and GF need to go to D.C. and get some money for Military Power..... They seem to just be handing it out like it grows on trees...
I detest life-insurance agents; they always argue that I shall some day die, which is not so.
User avatar
CrazyCatman
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 6:57 am
Location: Nashville, TN
Call Sign: Crazy Cat

Re: Barack Obama

Postby Luther Sloan on Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:52 am

Just a little thought here... I know it isn't my "place" to do so, as I'm not an Admin, but I'd like to expand on what KT wrote...

KnightTemplar wrote:Ok, I know Barack Obama isn't the most popular person on hear right now, and I know that several of you have "fears" about what his presidency will mean to the U.S. I also know that I do not like limiting what people can and can't say, but this thread is just getting ridiculous. Please keep the Obama-bashing to a minimum and only post relevant information here. Thank you.


That being said, he is now our President. I would like to point out that divisions among the country are bound to happen, especially between parties, but the more we actively protest and bash the Presidency, the weaker we become as a nation. I'd like to point out a little something that we knew in our fight against the "oppressive British"... A house, divided amongst itself, can not stand.

Now, I'm not saying we should blindly follow him, if we do we become no better than those who blindly follow anyone (Hitler, Caesar, ect), just that we may want to consider the implications of our posts. While all our (current) members are from allied countries, not everyone who visits may be.
"So of the stories you told me, which ones were true?"
"All of them were true."
"What about the lies?"
"Especially the lies."
User avatar
Luther Sloan
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
 
Posts: 130
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 1:01 pm
Location: Everywhere
How did you find out about Military Power?: I have my sources
Call Sign: Spooky

Previous

Return to Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron